This bulletin has been prepared especially for clients of A. N. Deringer, Inc. by:
SERKO & SIMON LLP – Customs & International Trade Law
August 8, 2005
CUSTOMS and BORDER PROTECTION ("CBP")
Safeguards – 1) The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements ("CITA") announced that it is extending the period for making determinations on six pending China textile safeguard petitions until August 31, 2005. The extension is a result of CITA's request to consult with the domestic industry and members of Congress on whether to pursue a broader agreement with China over its exports of textile and apparel articles, much like the agreement recently reached between China and the EU; 2) irrespective of possible negotiations toward a broader textile and apparel agreement, CITA announced it is accepting for deliberations safeguard petitions on the following Chinese exports: cotton, wool, and MMF socks (cat. 332/432/632pt.), cotton and MMF woven shirts and blouses (cat. 341/641), cotton and MMF skirts (cat. 342/642), cotton and MMF nightwear (cat. 351/651), and cotton and MMF swimwear (cat. 359S/659S).
Export Tariffs – Commensurate with the agreement between China and the EU regarding the re-imposition of quota on certain textile and apparel articles, China announced it is removing the export tariffs it imposed on those categories. In an effort to head off a sharp rise in exports, China imposed export tariffs on sensitive categories beginning January 1, 2005. China has now decided that it will withdraw these export tariffs for any goods that are subject to safeguards or other import restrictions.
U.S.-China Meet Over Trade Issues – The U.S. and China recently concluded a meeting of the Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade at which agreement was reached on several issues relating to U.S. trade concerns. China agreed to increase criminal prosecutions of intellectual property rights (IPR) violators, implement regulations to reduce exports of infringing merchandise, cooperate with other law enforcement agencies, establish an IPR Ombudsman at its Washington D.C. embassy, and facilitate increased U.S. exports to China.
TRADE TALK
Fair Trade Developments: The U.S. Commerce Department recently: 1) issued an antidumping ("AD") order on certain metal calendar slides from Japan; 2) revoked the AD order on mechanical transfer presses from Japan; 3) reached an affirmative determination in its five-year sunset review of petroleum wax candles from China; 4) terminated its five-year sunset review of its AD order on electroluminescent flat panel displays from Japan; 5) recently instituted special Section 337 investigations into alleged patent and trademark infringements of the following articles: certain laminated interlocking floor panels; certain hand-held mobile computing devices, components thereof, and its cradle; certain tissue converting machinery.
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ("WTO")
BUSINESS BRIEFS
The CPSC recently issued the following recalls: 1) certain treadmills, as their spring/shock may be damaged upon assembly and may propel shock parts out; 2) certain bicycles, as the wheels may collapse and/or the rear axle may crack; 3) certain slow cookers, as the handles may break and cause the hot contents to spill; 4) certain children's folding chairs, as their folding locks may fail, causing the chair to collapse; 5) certain baby denim and knit jackets, as their metal buttons may detach and pose a choking hazard; 6) certain industrial fire extinguishers, as the valves may separate and cause a safety hazard to handlers.
TRANSPORTATION TIDBITS
U.S. LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS
COURT CASES
2) In a second case against the same importer, the CIT reviewed the importer's failure to properly report the value of vehicles and components it imported, as well as the effect of assists and other lump sum payments on the actual transaction value. In finding that the importer failed to exercise reasonable care, failed to make a good faith effort to meet its obligations pursuant to its own Reconciliation Agreement, and its employees failed to follow its own customs compliance measures, the court found the importer guilty of negligence. In weighing the severity of the importer's culpability and the significant public interest in favor of the imposition of a heavy penalty, the CIT found that's that the importer's actions did not warrant any mitigation and assessed the statutory maximum penalty for negligence in this case, which totals over $17 million. Both cases may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Serko & Simon LLP
1700 Broadway, 31st Floor
New York, New York 10019
Phone (212) 775-0055 Fax (212) 839-9103
Outside of New York State: 1-800-46-TRADE
E-mail address: serko-simon@customs-law.com On the internet at: http://www.customs-law.com
Note: This information is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, which can only be provided by Serko & Simon LLP on a case-by-case basis. ©2005